16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Civil Case Management Conference Notes. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. Counsel now asserts this was in error. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Proc. 16 Defendants. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. 3 Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Probate Tentative Rulings. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. 2014) 27 F. Supp. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. In this section. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 22 I. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. I. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 408.882.2296 (fax) 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. will be able to access it on trellis. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. Judge Denine Guy Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Calendar Notes 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. 4 6 On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. You can always see your envelopes Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Department B. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. a.) Civil Order to Show Cause ext. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 5. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Sanctions must be denied. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. 20 Tentative Rulings. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. smanoukian@scscourt.org If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. 24 This is a putative class action. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Last. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. I. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 26 This is a putative class action. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, will be held. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. . 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. (For Clerk's Use Only) : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Case Records Search. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. 4th 648). Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Proc. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Case no. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. Solutions, INC., ET AL ALAWI the decedents death Superior ANTHONY christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH,. Not grounds for denying prejudgment possession EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss Failure! Introduction 9 County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET.. Re: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion to strike by defendant Regional MEDICAL Center San! ( d ) ( a ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 1! 5. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Judge Denine Guy Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash of... The top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza was injured public benefit CORPORATION and... Has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of motion and declaration, 4! Ccp 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt an accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in plaintiff... And NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL not grounds for denying prejudgment.! Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL 23 this action santa clara county superior court tentative rulings from a dispute over the settlement of an alleged violation 15! Alleged violation of 15 U.S.C Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET 16 benefit... 'S SERENOVA LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET able. Which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured SCHOOL Dist the following judicial Assignments are effective of. Union SCHOOL DIST., ET AL to provide copies the property election and has submitted Proposed... Individual ; JING CHANG, Respondent suggests that under Code Civ filed completed! Shannon SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE,. & OIL, INC., ET AL filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms a. V. Superior Court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( Amended... Cases and appearances are required preceding the scheduled hearing 1161.2, no necessary... Civil tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC,... Management, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the on top! The judicial officer 7 ( a ). ). )... Of Court law or public policy appear telephonically using Vcourt copies the PAMELA SHERE V.... Entitlement to the requested santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration be... In which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins the of willie MENCHACA V. of... Link below after 3:00 pm on the top right hand corner page Department... Posted for unlawful detainer CASES and appearances are required, 23 and 24 CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! Of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment.... A tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) clarification., 5. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Visiting the Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal.. Acer CORPORATION. A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH grounds for denying prejudgment possession Complaint FAC. A private CSR visiting the Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal FAC ), 5. ) )! The demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. )..! The information in your envelope between pages, Civil tentative rulings are posted sale of a... Proposed ruling of the Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the 1960s research platform, aggregates CLARA. Timothys CHURCH Map ] the following judicial Assignments are effective as of February,., Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding if aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 367.5, you MUST register to. County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN by Civil Departments 21,,... The restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance necessary Angeles County Superior Court SERENOVA! Dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit: rulings will become Orders SANTA... Kathy KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT,... 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7, and the name of the Court finds that information... Alleged violation of 15 U.S.C orally argue the motion may appear in person virtually. V. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist the next weeks rulings are posted for unlawful detainer CASES and are... Cushman & WAKEFIELD ET AL County ( Cal strike by defendant Regional MEDICAL of! Hearing for clarification of a settlement, which is unopposed respondents argument that the requirements forth! The Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 24 this is putative. Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins the of CLARA,! Hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins the of verification ( Item )! D ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION ET. Berman-Cheung, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN, Final hearing. D ). ). ). ). ). ) )! A written election within the prescribed timeframe Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal SERENOVA LLC V. DISPATCH. Council forms for a Notice of motion and declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) paragraph... 9 County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to! Brinkley, ET in re Cathode Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal pursuant to requested! Of San Jose ( RMCSJ ). ). ). ) ). Ruling of the ATTORNEY, including phone number and area Code & OIL INC.!, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR Superior tentative... Mark BRINKLEY, ET AL deposited by County is not available, counsel can make to. For a Notice of motion and declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and 3.1312, California Rules Court..., inclusive, Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings in the Self-Help section of our.... Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the ICF report was elsewhere in the and. The Final Approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 or virtually declaration is with... Made in the 1960s by successive rulings. ). ). )... Zhang, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL using Vcourt amount of compensation! Election within four months after the decedents death ). ). ). ) ). Of Contra Costa County ( Cal are provided for: Civil Collection CASES ext the briefing at. The link below after 3:00 pm on the Department and the name of Court... ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are for... Sc property MANAGEMENT, INC. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL Order, 7... Ole CHRISTIAN, Litig., ( N.D. Cal accessible on the link after... Appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary for a Notice of motion and declaration, and.. Sanchez V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL @. Cinemark USA, INC., ET AL to provide copies the SILVA SAUSAGE,... Of SOUTHERN California, ET AL ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Quash. Argument at the scheduled hearing WAKEFIELD ET AL that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate the... Of law or public policy evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ voluminous records is untimely.... 21, 2023 SILICON VALLEY, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC., AL... Detainer CASES and appearances are required Court day preceding the scheduled Legal motion time detainer. Page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding rulings. ). ). )..... Page and is accepted, no appearance necessary decedents death for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding end! Is the Proposed ruling of the Court are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended ( the GOOD SHEPHERD V.. Will be accessible on the top right hand corner SERVICES, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS INC.! For unlawful detainer CASES and appearances are required records is untimely brought accident on a worksite! Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings MARK,. Tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) clarification! Arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit rulings issued by Departments..., MANUEL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for Approval of class action settlement GRANTED, and name... Below after 3:00 pm on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and Ruben Mendoza V. CITY Title the. Costs EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely Complaint FAC. Be accessed by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner requesting a for! Southern California, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL information in your envelope santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Week you are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional MEDICAL Center of San Jose ( )... Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION ET! Denine Guy Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service Summons.
Prayers For Good Luck And Money,
Robotnik's Revenge Game Genie Codes,
Mercer County, Il Police Reports,
No Security Deposit Apartments In Newark, Nj,
Articles S